| policies | how I grade papers | tips on writing | assignments | weekly calendar | Osborne home |
|
This handout is required reading. You are responsible for all information on it. Study it carefully and refer to it frequently. If anything is unclear, don't hesitate to ask questions. Seek me out whenever you have questions about anything. Also get to know your fellow students. Form a study group with two or three other students, and stay in touch with each other. Your instructor: Karen Osborne,
Ph.D. Please call me Karen.
Spring 2000 OFFICE HOURS:
Required Text
The “Official” Columbia College
course description
More description:
Intended Student Learning Outcomes
This course supports that outcome, and can be substituted for Introduction to Literature in fulfillment of the General Education Requirement IF you obtain a written waiver from the chair. See me. In addition, this course should enable you to: 1. demonstrate an understanding of works by two American authors in some depth by writing critical essays about these works 2. demonstrate a broad understanding of three important periods, movements, or terms in 20th Century American literature. 3. demonstrate a knowledge of the diversity of American literature by naming and discussing at least three writers not of Euro-American heritage. 4. recognize and discuss passages from important works of American literature Literature Minor
Reading Notes
Drafts, Papers and Deadlines
WRITING CENTER--first floor, 33
E. Congress
Plagiarism
Attendance
Tardiness
Classroom Behavior
What Counts
For What, Or Assignments And Grading
Guidelines for Papers about Literature, and How I Grade When I grade the final drafts of your papers, I evaluate them according to fairly recognizable standards. The following should help you understand what I am looking for and how I will grade. The papers you write should demonstrate your ability to read, analyze, and interpret literature. Be sure to have a clear thesis, use evidence from the text to support the thesis, offer sufficient analysis and interpretation of that evidence, and follow a logical organization. I expect all papers to be well written in clear English prose. I will also consider the quality of your insights. Highly successful (A) papers will meet the following description: "The writer has successfully analyzed and interpreted a textual element or elements such as plot, character, point of view, imagery, setting, form, theme, irony, tone, symbols, language or any similar elements. The writer has grounded arguments in specific references to text. The essay has a clear thesis supported by sound logic and good organization. The essay is thoroughly developed." Successful (B) papers will meet the following description: "The writer has analyzed a textual element or elements such as plot, character, point of view, imagery, setting, form, theme, irony, tone, symbols, language or any similar elements. The writer has grounded arguments in at least some specific references to text. The essay has a clear thesis, but may need one of the following: more textual support, more analytical or interpretive development, or clearer logic and/or organization." Moderately successful (C) papers will fit the following description: "The writer has analyzed or paid some attention to texts or a textual element(s), has made an effort toward interpretation, and has some supporting references and/or evidence, but the essay does not fully develop or support its thesis in a logical fashion, or the thesis may not be sufficiently clear." Unsuccessful (D or F) papers can be described with SOME or MOST of the following: "The writer has not sufficiently analyzed or interpreted the text; there may be textual references, but not in clear support of an interpretation; AND/OR the writer has failed to offer a clear thesis supported by sound logic; AND/OR has not responded to the assignment." WRITING CENTER--1st floor, 506 S. Wabash/33 E. Congress (SW corner of Congress and Wabash)- Even the best writers show their work to someone for feedback before they present it to the public. Just talking over your ideas and planning the organization with a helpful friend or a tutor can save lots of time and diminish your anxiety. Consider signing up for weekly noncredit tutoring. WHAT COUNTS FOR WHAT, OR ASSIGNMENTS AND GRADING I If the total points possible is 100, then you need at least 90 points for an ‘A,’ 80 for a ‘B,’ 70 for a ‘C,’ and 60 points to pass. The exact final numbers will be determined by the quizzes and by any adjustments I may need to make to reflect the needs of this particular class. You can earn extra credit (a maximum
of 5 points total all semester) by attending worthwhile literary , theater
performances, or museum exhibits and writing brief reaction papers or reviews.
I especially encourage you to attend readings at Columbia and to write
reviews of any plays produced by the Columbia Theatre Department. Many
local theaters also have discount rates for students.
Tips for writing papers about literature The papers you write should demonstrate your ability to read, analyze, and interpret literature. Your paper should have a clear thesis, use evidence from the text to support the thesis, offer sufficient analysis and interpretation of that evidence, and follow a logical progression. I. The paper is an analysis of a text and an interpretation based on that analysis. The audience is readers who have already read the text. IF YOU MERELY REPEAT WHAT THE STORY SAYS, WITHOUT INTERPRETATION, YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE A PASSING GRADE. A thesis statement is a debatable proposition, that is, a statement (a complete sentence containing a subject and verb) about which reasonable people might disagree. ("Alienation in Story X" is a title, not a thesis. A possible thesis: "The alienation character Y feels in Story X is a logical response to the crass materialism of her environment." (For evidence you might cite the high number of references to stores, money, valuable material objects, etc.) Your paper must have a clear thesis supported by evidence in a logical progression of sufficiently developed and well-written paragraphs. Show me, show me, show me. Show me exactly where and exactly how (refer to SPECIFIC words, phrases, lines, events, characters, etc.) the story, poem or play does what you are saying it does. The thesis should make an interesting point ABOUT the story, poem or idea (not merely to repeat what the story says) and should be clearly stated, preferably at the end of the first paragraph. I also expect a strong conclusion that does more than simply restate the thesis. Show why the thesis was worth proving, after all. II. Make sure the topic is NARROW enough and that you say enough about it. Say something--show us what your mind can do with the text. Select one aspect of the literary work and discuss how it functions and connects with the WHOLE work. Show that you have read closely, and that you can ANALYZE the significance of CONTENT and FORM--the two are inseparable, so by analyzing carefully how something is written, you are also analyzing meaning. Be sure to SAY ENOUGH about the part you've chosen. Most drafts need more DEVELOPMENT--you need to SHOW the reader exactly what your point is, what evidence supports it, and WHY your point is so important. I will take points off for fuzzy thinking, vague language, insufficient development, and poor transitions. Read the chapter on literature papers in your Comp I or II handbook (you did save your handbook, didn’t you? asked the concerned teacher...) III. Read your draft aloud, have friends or fellow students read it, and rewrite it, cutting redundancy and adding new material to strengthen weak paragraphs. Ask "so what?" at the end of every paragraph--then write at least two more sentences to answer the "so what." Sometimes you'll need to add much more than just a few sentences to actually pursue the answer. You must turn in your ROUGH DRAFT two weeks ahead of the date the paper is due. The rough drafts MUST be double-spaced. AFTER REVISING, BE SURE TO PROOFREAD CAREFULLY. I will take points off for grammatical mistakes, inconsistent/inaccurate punctuation, or any obstacles that prevent the paper from achieving its purpose. Let your natural voice come through,
to the extent possible in standard English. Aim for clarity, economy, conviction:
cut away as much phoniness and verbal confusion as you can. No "Englishteacherese."
When you finish a draft, read it critically and revise, revise, revise.
Papers must be typed or computer-printed, 3-5 pages minimum, double-spaced,
with 1" margins. Pages must be numbered.
|
Calendar of Assignments
(always read material and write reading notes before you come to class on the date specified; remember, there will be weekly quizzes)Feb. 14: Introduction to course. Study questions and study groups. In-class essay.
Kate Chopin, 527-529; “The Story of an Hour,” 536-538.Feb. 21:
1. "Late Nineteenth Century, 1865-1910," pp. 3-14 only;
2. Mary Wilkins Freeman, 155-157; “The Revolt of Mother,” 167-178
3. Charles Chesnutt, 348-349; "The Goophered Grapevine," 350-358.
3. Howells, fr. "Criticism and Fiction," 432-434.
4. Stephen Crane, 599-601. "The Open Boat," 608-624.Feb. 28:
1. Henry James, 449-452; "The Beast in the Jungle," 498-527.
2. Edith Wharton, 1012-1014; "Roman Fever," 1071-1079
3. Finish "Late Nineteenth Century" intro, pp. 15-34.
Discussion of paper topics and writing papers about literature.
March 6: Paper topics due.
1. Paul Laurence Dunbar, 377-379; "We Wear the Mask," 389-390; "Frederick Douglass," 385-387.
2. Zitkala-Sa (Gertrude Bonnin), 859-860; "The Cutting of My Long Hair," 864-860-933;
"Why I Am a Pagan," 971-873.
3. "Toward The Modern Age," 915-917.
3. W.E.B. DuBois, 943-946; from The Souls of Black Folk, chapt. 3, 951-960.
4. Begin "Modern Period, 1910-1945," pp. 883-914;
read to p. 897 ("Modernism and the Self”) for todayMarch 13: TURN IN ROUGH DRAFT OF FIRST PAPER TODAY. DOUBLE-SPACE!
1..Finish reading “Modern Period, 1910-1945, through p. 914)
2. James Weldon Johnson, 968-969; “Lift Every Voice…”, 969; chapter x from
Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man, 972-987
4. Sherwood Anderson, 1164-1165; “Hands,” 1166-1169
5. Hemingway, 1519-1521: "Hills Like White Elephants" 1522-1525
6. Faulkner, 1544-1548; "Barn Burning," 1554-1566.March 20: Rough drafts returned with comments.
1. Frost, 1146-1147; "Out, out," 1155; "The Ax-Helve,"
1156-1157; "Desert Places," 1160, "Design, " 1161.
3. Wm.Carlos Williams, 1267-1369; "The Great Figure" and "Spring and All," 1272;
"The Red Wheebarrow,” 1277; “Descent” & "The Pink Locust,”1285-1288.
4. T.S. Eliot, 1397-1398; "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock," 1399-1403.March 27: TURN IN REVISED FIRST PAPER.
1. Wallace Stevens, 1533-34; "Sunday Morning," 1534-38;
"The Snow Man," 1538.
2. Louise Bogan, 1512-1513; "Night," 1518.
3. Marianne Moore, 1501-1502; “Poetry,” 1502-1503.
4. E.E. Cummings, 1385-86; "anyone lived in a pretty how town," 1392-1393.
5. Hart Crane, 1566-1568, “The River,” 1572-1576.SPRING BREAK no class April 3
April 10: First Papers returned.
1. "The New Negro Renaissance," 1578-1581.
2. Zora Neale Hurston, 1670-72; "The Gilded Six Bits," 1680-88.
3. Langston Hughes, 1611-1612; “The Weary Blues,” 1613-1614;
"Dream Variations," 1618-1619; "Harlem," 1619.
4. Nella Larsen, 1697-1698, from Passing, 1699-1712.
5. Claude McKay, 1688-1689, “If We Must Die,” 1689.
6. "Contemporary Period, 1945-present," pp. 2012-2017
Discussion of topics for second paper.April 17: TOPICS for Second Paper due.
1. "Part I: Literature of the Cold War: Orthodoxy and Resistance,” 2018-2023.
2. Bellow, 2556-2557, "Looking for Mr. Green," 2558-2572
3. Brooks, 2337-39; "We Real Cool," 2344; "A Bronzeville Mother Loiters.." 2345-48
4. Baldwin, 2221-2222 “Sonny’s Blues,” 2222-2243.April 24:
1. Bishop, 2319-21; "The Fish," 2321
2. Lowell, 2328-29; "Skunk Hour," 2331 and “For the Union Dead,” 2333-35
3. Ginsberg, 2441-42; from Howl, 2443-2452
4. "Part II: New Communities, New Identities, New Energies," 2455-2461
May 1: TURN in rough draft of second paper
1. Plath, 2405-06; "Lady Lazarus," 2409.
2. Rich, 2582-83; "Diving into the Wreck" 2583-2586
3. Harjo, 3116; "Woman Hanging..." 3117-3119
4. Lorde, 2937-38; "Power" 2939-40
6. "Part III: Postmodernity and Difference: Promises and Threats," 2821-2824May 8: Rough drafts returned with comments.
1. Gloria Anzaldúa, 3041-3042, from Borderlands/La Frontera, 3042-3065.
2. David Henry Hwang, 2824-2825; M. Butterfly, 2826-2872; "Afterword,", 2872-2875May 15: REVISED SECOND PAPERS DUE. ALSO READ:
1. John Barth, 2875-2877; "Lost in the Funhouse," 2877-2892.
2. Mukherjee, 3189-3191; "A Wife's Story," 3191-3200
3. Morrison, 3226-3229, from Sula, 3230-3237.
3. Poets to be announced (class members will suggest)May 22: FINAL EXAMINATION.
If you want your exams returned, bring a SASE (at least 2 stamps); preferably a manila envelope with 4 stamps
May 29: Memorial Day.
No class.
|
Disclaimer |
|
© 1999 Columbia
College Chicago
600 South Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60605-1996 Telephone: 312-663-1600 |